← All accountability cases

FinancialPrivacyOversight
Left-to-right progression showing Prescott’s Flock program growing from 16 stationary ALPR cameras and $49,330 in documented 2023 costs to a network of more than 30 ALPRs and expanded surveillance capabilities, with $498,550.12 in projected combined 2027 spending.
The program’s scope and documented cost, 2023 to the FY2027 proposal. The 2027 figure combines a $154,000 purchase order with a $344,550.12 order form that has not been signed.Download the full-resolution image (PNG)

At a glance

Status
Documented cost and scope growth; the largest figure is an unsigned proposal
Documented 2023
$49,330.00 invoiced — 16 fixed ALPR cameras
Documented 2023–2026
$266,969.15 invoiced
FY2027 purchase order
$154,000.00 (PO 02270042, OMNIA contract R250203)
Unsigned order form
$344,550.12 year one; $291,250.12 annually thereafter
Projected combined FY2027
$498,550.12 — more than ten times the 2023 figure
Conclusion strength
Documented figures; the $344,550.12 is a proposal, not a purchase

Key quotations

“Access to all privately owned Flock devices within your jurisdiction that have been shared with you.”

— Flock Safety, FlockOS “Elite” package — Community Cameras (Full Access), in a quote to Prescott PD, August 8, 2023

View original record(03_Quotes_and_Pricing.pdf, PDF p. 57)

“Upload a suspect vehicle photo from and [sic] alternative source (i.e. CCTV, doorbell camera, mobile phone), and machine learning will match it to vehicles recorded by Flock Safety cameras in the past 30 days”

— Flock Safety, FlockOS “Elite” package — Visual Search, August 8, 2023

View original record(03_Quotes_and_Pricing.pdf, PDF p. 57)

“Flock Safety built and maintained agency website that allows citizens to register their cameras and indicate that they may be viewed by law enforcement. Law enforcement can view each registered camera’s location on the FlockOS map.”

— Flock Safety, FlockOS “Elite” package — Camera Registry Program, August 8, 2023

View original record(03_Quotes_and_Pricing.pdf, PDF p. 58)

Contract-value history

Each amount comes from a specific invoice, purchase order, or vendor order form. The 2023 through 2026 rows are grouped by the year the invoices were billed. The 2027 row is the FY2027 purchasing cycle — nothing in it has been invoiced, and one of its two figures has not been signed.

On a narrow screen this table scrolls sideways. The same figures appear as cards underneath it.

Contract values by year, separating invoiced and committed amounts from proposed amounts.
YearExecuted or invoicedAdditional orders or chargesCombined amount
2023$49,330.00Invoiced$49,330.00Documented
2024$55,800.25Invoiced$47,839.00Invoiced$103,639.25Documented
2025$56,289.50Invoiced$1,420.90Invoiced$57,710.40Documented
2026$56,289.50Invoiced$56,289.50Documented
2027$154,000.00Purchase order$344,550.12Unsigned proposal$498,550.12Projected

Documented total, 2023–2026

$266,969.15

Invoiced by the vendor and billed to the City.

Projected combined FY2027 amount

$498,550.12

A $154,000 purchase order plus a $344,550.12 unsigned proposal. Not money already spent.

The change

10×

The projected FY2027 amount is more than ten times the $49,330 documented in 2023.

Record by record

What the later materials describe

The 2023 purchase was 16 cameras that read license plates. The order form and quote records describe a broader system. Each item below is what the document says the product does — not a finding about how Prescott uses it, and not confirmation that Prescott has bought it.

The hardware counts come from the unsigned order form. The software capabilities are the FlockOS “Elite” package described in the quote record. Prescott has been invoiced for a FlockOS Elite package previously, so some of these features may already be in use; the records supplied do not settle which are switched on today.

Timeline

  1. March 2023

    City Contract No. 2023-151 is executed for 16 fixed ALPR cameras; invoice INV-21800 bills $49,330.00.

    View original record(01_Contracts_and_Amendments.pdf, PDF pp. 10–12)

  2. 2024

    Two invoices total $103,639.25 — camera licensing plus FlockOS, a Wing Gateway, an Elite package, and professional services.

    View original record(04_Invoices_and_Payments.pdf, PDF pp. 21 and 24)

  3. 2025

    The renewal bills $56,289.50, and a November replacement charge adds $1,420.90 — $57,710.40 documented for the year.

    View original record(04_Invoices_and_Payments.pdf, PDF pp. 27 and 30)

  4. June 15, 2026

    The 2026–2027 renewal bills $56,289.50.

    View original record(04_Invoices_and_Payments.pdf, PDF p. 33)

  5. June 29 – July 1, 2026

    Purchase order 02270042 commits $154,000 for Flock LPR and camera equipment under OMNIA contract R250203, approved on the FY2027 Approved Expenditure List.

    View original record(02_Procurement_and_Purchasing.pdf, PDF pp. 3–4)

  6. Undated in the supplied records

    A Flock order form headed “Project Prove It” proposes 30 Falcon plate readers plus a Solar Falcon LR, Condor fixed and PTZ video cameras, and implementation services — $344,550.12 in year one and $291,250.12 annually thereafter. Its signature page is blank.

    View original record(01_Contracts_and_Amendments.pdf, PDF pp. 5–8)

Issues & possible violations

How to read the labels

Documented fact
Directly stated or shown in a primary record.
Supported inference
A conclusion reasonably supported by multiple records.
Unresolved
Requires missing records, audit work, or legal interpretation.
Not established
An allegation the available evidence does not prove.
Documented fact

A. Documented spending grew from $49,330 to $266,969.15 across four years

#

Evidence: Invoices INV-21800 ($49,330.00), INV-41953 ($55,800.25), INV-42684 ($47,839.00), INV-67184 ($56,289.50), INV-78879 ($1,420.90), and INV-96579 ($56,289.50).

Argument: What began as a test-and-evaluation purchase became a recurring annual obligation of roughly $56,000, plus one-off charges. This is the documented baseline against which any expansion should be measured.

Status: Documented fact — every figure ties to a vendor invoice.

Original evidence: View original record(04_Invoices_and_Payments.pdf, PDF p. 15) View original record(04_Invoices_and_Payments.pdf, PDF p. 21) View original record(04_Invoices_and_Payments.pdf, PDF p. 33)

Documented fact

B. A $154,000 purchase order is committed for FY2027

#

Evidence: PO 02270042, dated July 1, 2026, for Flock LPR and camera equipment under OMNIA contract R250203, approved on the FY2027 Approved Expenditure List on June 29, 2026.

Argument: This is nearly three times the documented 2023 purchase, obligated through a cooperative contract rather than a competitive solicitation of Prescott’s own.

Status: Documented fact — committed, not yet invoiced.

Original evidence: View original record(02_Procurement_and_Purchasing.pdf, PDF pp. 3–4)

Documented fact

C. The largest figure, $344,550.12, is an unsigned and undated order form

#

Evidence: The order form records a Subtotal Year 1 of $344,550.12 and an annual recurring subtotal of $291,250.12. Its signature page carries empty template fields — no signature, name, title, date, or PO number — and the supplied file bears no valid execution date.

Argument: A proposal of this size is a decision still to be made, which is precisely why it belongs in front of the public before it is signed rather than after. It must not be described, budgeted, or reported as an approved expenditure.

Status: Documented fact — a proposal, not a purchase.

Original evidence: View original record(01_Contracts_and_Amendments.pdf, PDF pp. 5–7) View original record(01_Contracts_and_Amendments.pdf, PDF p. 8)

Documented fact

D. The proposed system is different in kind, not just in size

#

Evidence: The order form adds Condor fixed and PTZ video cameras to the plate readers; the FlockOS Elite feature list adds nationwide plate lookups, convoy analysis, visual matching from outside images, access to private community cameras, a public camera registry, and interior floor plans.

Argument: Prescott approved plate readers. Live video, private-camera access, and building interiors are separate capabilities that residents have not been asked about, and each raises questions the 2023 decision never addressed.

Status: Documented fact as to what the records describe.

Original evidence: View original record(01_Contracts_and_Amendments.pdf, PDF p. 5) View original record(03_Quotes_and_Pricing.pdf, PDF pp. 57–58)

Unresolved

E. Which capabilities are switched on in Prescott today is unresolved

#

Argument: Prescott has been invoiced for a FlockOS Elite package, so some of these features may already be active. The supplied records do not show which are enabled, which agencies Prescott shares with, or whether nationwide lookup is turned on.

Status: Unresolved — requires a current system configuration and sharing report.

Original evidence: View original record(04_Invoices_and_Payments.pdf, PDF p. 24)

Not established

F. The $498,550.12 has not been approved or spent

#

Argument: The projected combined figure adds a committed purchase order to an unsigned proposal. It describes what FY2027 would cost if the proposal is signed as written — nothing in the records shows that decision has been made.

Status: Not established — and presented here only as a projection.

Original evidence: View original record(02_Procurement_and_Purchasing.pdf, PDF pp. 3–4) View original record(01_Contracts_and_Amendments.pdf, PDF p. 8)

Four questions worth answering first

  1. Necessity — what specific problem requires each new capability? Plate readers, live video, convoy analysis, floor plans, and a private-camera registry are different tools addressing different problems, and a case for one is not a case for all of them.
  2. Privacy — what information is collected, searched, shared, and retained? Statewide and nationwide lookups and community-camera access extend well beyond Prescott’s own cameras.
  3. Security — who can access the systems, and how is misuse prevented or detected? More integrations mean more accounts, more agencies, and more ways in.
  4. Proportionality — are the scale and cost justified by documented results? The reported outcomes are the City’s own; no independent audit of them appears in the records.

Evidence

Every quotation and material claim above links to the exact page of the full original public record. The complete source documents: