Cases

  • ProceduralTransparencyOversightEthical

    Flock Procurement: Avoiding Competing Bids and Council Approval

    Records show officials sought sole-source documentation to avoid other bids and timed the contract to a rule change that avoided Council approval.

    Status
    Documented concern; independent audit warranted
    Dates
    Nov 2022 – FY 2023–24

    Read the full case →

  • TransparencyOversightEthical

    Public Discussion Delayed Until After Deployment

    After the contract was signed, the police chief recommended deferring any Council study session until after installation and a 60-day trial produced “success stories”; the interim city manager agreed.

    Status
    Strongly supported documented transparency/oversight concern
    Dates
    Feb – Mar 2023 (Council record: Jan 2026)

    Read the full case →

  • OversightPrivacyProcedural

    The System Operated for Years Before Detailed Safeguards Appeared

    Cameras began operating in 2023, but the formal ALPR policy the City supplied is dated October 6, 2025, and the detailed procedures — case numbers, documented search reasons, sanctions, and monthly hot-list audits — were still marked “DRAFT” on December 19, 2025.

    Status
    Documented timing gap; governing rules for 2023–2025 unresolved
    Dates
    Nov 2022 – Dec 2025

    Read the full case →

  • FinancialPrivacyOversight

    From 16 Cameras to a Surveillance Network

    The program began with 16 plate readers and $49,330 in documented 2023 costs; the FY2027 materials pair a $154,000 purchase order with an unsigned $344,550.12 order form for a far broader system.

    Status
    Documented cost and scope growth; the largest figure is an unsigned proposal
    Dates
    2023 – FY2027

    Read the full case →