← All accountability cases

TransparencyOversightEthical

At a glance

Status
Strongly supported documented transparency/oversight concern
Participants
Police Chief Amy Bonney; Interim City Manager Tyler Goodman
Decision
Defer Council study session until after the 60-day trial
Contract executed
March 3, 2023 (before installation)
Deferral exchange
March 6–7, 2023
Council study-session record
January 27, 2026 (per the supplied Council file)
Conclusion strength
Documented concern — not a proven legal violation

Key quotations

“It has not come to study session and we definitely would prefer that it not, at least not initially.”

— Police Chief Amy Bonney, March 6, 2023

View original record(06_Police_Department_Communications.pdf, PDF p. 45)

“after the trial phase (60 days from date of installation and training).”

— Police Chief Amy Bonney, defining the proposed delay, March 6, 2023

View original record(06_Police_Department_Communications.pdf, PDF p. 45)

“That makes sense and I think bringing it forward to a study after the trail [sic] period makes sense.”

— Interim City Manager Tyler Goodman, March 7, 2023

View original record(06_Police_Department_Communications.pdf, PDF p. 46)

Timeline

  1. February 27, 2023

    Bonney tells the mayor the planned demo and hoped-for contract would cover major ingress/egress routes and says she expects “great success.”

    View original record(06_Police_Department_Communications.pdf, PDF p. 43)

  2. March 3, 2023

    City Contract No. 2023-151 is executed for $48,100 — before physical installation.

    View original record(01_Contracts_and_Amendments.pdf, PDF pp. 10–12)

  3. March 6, 2023

    Goodman asks whether the program has come to a study session and notes the mayor wants “to make the public aware of this at some point.” Bonney replies that it has not, and “we definitely would prefer that it not, at least not initially,” recommending a presentation only after the trial produces “success stories.”

    View original record(06_Police_Department_Communications.pdf, PDF pp. 44–46)

  4. March 7, 2023

    Goodman agrees that bringing it to a study session after the trial period “makes sense.” Bonney says she will let him know when the trial is complete so they can schedule it.

    View original record(06_Police_Department_Communications.pdf, PDF p. 46)

  5. June 14–16, 2023

    Installation records show a technician onsite, with Flock reporting all but three locations installed by June 16.

    View original record(10_Installation_and_Maintenance_2023.pdf, June 2023 installation thread)

  6. January 27, 2026

    The supplied Council file documents an ALPR study session.

    View original record(05_City_Council_and_Government_Approval.pdf, PDF pp. 16–20)

Issues & possible violations

How to read the labels

Documented fact
Directly stated or shown in a primary record.
Supported inference
A conclusion reasonably supported by multiple records.
Unresolved
Requires missing records, audit work, or legal interpretation.
Not established
An allegation the available evidence does not prove.
Documented fact

A. Contract executed before public discussion

#

Evidence: The $48,100 contract was executed on March 3, 2023; the study-session deferral was discussed March 6–7, 2023 — after execution but before physical installation.

Argument: The sequence put contractual and operational commitment ahead of any Council study session, reducing the practical opportunity for elected officials and the public to weigh in before the City was committed.

Status: Documented from the contract and email dates.

Original evidence: View original record(01_Contracts_and_Amendments.pdf, PDF pp. 10–12) View original record(06_Police_Department_Communications.pdf, PDF p. 45)

Documented fact

B. Trial recommended before any public discussion

#

“It has not come to study session and we definitely would prefer that it not, at least not initially.”

— Police Chief Amy Bonney, March 6, 2023

Argument: The chief recommended that the program not come to a Council study session initially, deferring it until “after the trial phase (60 days from date of installation and training).” She cited concern about people learning camera locations and about “conspiracy theorist” opposition.

Status: The recommendation and its stated reasons are documented. The records do not establish that a study session was legally required.

Original evidence: View original record(06_Police_Department_Communications.pdf, PDF p. 45)

Supported inference

C. Waiting for “success stories” before public discussion

#

Evidence: Bonney recommended presenting the program only after the trial so the department would have “some success stories to share.”

Argument: Timing public consideration to follow favorable anecdotes gives officials a narrative advantage: discussion begins after institutional commitment and with selected success stories already assembled. This is a governance/transparency concern about framing, not a claim of illegality.

Status: Supported by the chief’s own stated rationale.

Original evidence: View original record(06_Police_Department_Communications.pdf, PDF p. 45)

Documented fact

D. Interim city manager’s assent

#

“That makes sense and I think bringing it forward to a study after the trail [sic] period makes sense.”

— Interim City Manager Tyler Goodman, March 7, 2023

Argument: The interim city manager agreed with deferring the study session until after the trial, making the deferral a decision endorsed above the department level.

Status: Documented in the reply email.

Original evidence: View original record(06_Police_Department_Communications.pdf, PDF p. 46)

Public-notice research log

Search scope. The public records supplied to the project to date: the compiled contract file (01_Contracts_and_Amendments.pdf), Police Department communications (06_Police_Department_Communications.pdf), the City Council & government-approval file (05_City_Council_and_Government_Approval.pdf), and installation & maintenance records (10_Installation_and_Maintenance_2023.pdf). We have not independently searched the City’s full public archive of Council agendas, minutes, packets, notices, newsletters, or meeting recordings for January 2022 – January 2026.

Search date: July 2026

Candidate public-notice and Council-discussion events, with source and completeness notes
DateTypeBody / officeItemFlock/ALPRPublic?ActionSourceNote
Feb 27, 2023Staff email (mayoral briefing)Police Chief → MayorFlock trial, hoped-for contract, camera-coverage conceptNamedNoPrivate briefing; no public action View original record(06_Police_Department_Communications.pdf, PDF p. 43)Not a public event.
Mar 3, 2023Contract executionCity of Prescott / PoliceContract No. 2023-151 ($48,100)NamedNoContract executed View original record(01_Contracts_and_Amendments.pdf, PDF pp. 10–12)Administrative execution, not a Council item in the records searched.
Mar 6–7, 2023Staff email (deferral decision)Police Chief / Interim City ManagerWhether/when to hold a study sessionNamedNoStudy session deferred until after the 60-day trial View original record(06_Police_Department_Communications.pdf, PDF p. 45)
Jun 14–16, 2023Installation recordsCity of Prescott / FlockCamera installation threadNamedNoInstallation underway; most locations installed by Jun 16 View original record(10_Installation_and_Maintenance_2023.pdf, June 2023 thread)Source PDF pending (issue #38); page locator to be confirmed.
Jan 27, 2026Council study sessionPrescott City CouncilALPR presentation / study sessionNamedYesStudy-session discussion (per the supplied Council file) View original record(05_City_Council_and_Government_Approval.pdf, PDF pp. 16–20)Source PDF pending public posting (issue #38).

Records still to be requested

To close the gap above, request for January 2022 – January 2026:

  • All Council agendas, minutes, packets, presentations, recordings, and public notices concerning Flock or ALPR from January 2022 through January 2026.
  • Communications scheduling, postponing, preparing, or canceling an ALPR Council presentation or study session.
  • The promised notification after completion of the 60-day trial.
  • Documents identifying the trial start/end dates and the installation/training completion date.
  • Any “success stories” or metrics assembled for a contemplated presentation.
  • Records explaining why a 2023 presentation did or did not occur.
  • Budget hearings or capital-request presentations where the recurring Flock expense appeared, and whether Flock/ALPR was named or embedded in a broader line item.

Evidence

Original March 6–7, 2023 City of Prescott email thread, subject “RE: Camera 14,” in which Police Chief Amy Bonney recommends not taking the ALPR program to a Council study session until after the 60-day trial so the department has “success stories to share,” and Interim City Manager Tyler Goodman agrees.
The original March 6–7, 2023 email thread (06_Police_Department_Communications.pdf, p. 45). Shown as a rendered preview of the source page.

Download exhibits (selected excerpts, PDF) — a page-accurate packet of the cited pages, not the complete source files.

Every quotation and material claim above links to the exact page of the full original public record. The complete source documents: